top of page

EVALUATING THE STRUCTURE OF THE LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHIC SITUATION IN THE KRYVYI RIH REGION DURING THE ENEOLITHIC – EARLY BRONZE AGE ACCORDING TO THE MAPS OF KURGANS

Mykyta Ivanov

PhD Student, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Kyiv, Ukraine

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8473-9165

Email: mkt.ivanov@gmail.com

Keywords: eneolithic, kurgan, paleodemography, burial, population size, Yamnaya culture

Abstract

The suggested paper evaluates the structure of land use and demographic situation in the Kryvyi Rih region during the Eneolithic–Early Bronze Age according to the maps of kurgans. The 1853 map compiled by the Corps of Military Topographers is used as a source of primary data. Insights about kurgan density, leaning towards the watercourse of rivers and population size are made. The received results are also compared against the data about the Trypillia culture. Appealing to the demographic advantage of the Trypillia people, the author argues towards the migration of the trypillians to the steppe zone during the second half of the 4th Millenium BC which resulted in the formation of Trypillia-like cultures: Usatovo and Serezlievka

References

Daragan, M. (2013). Kurgany stepnoj chasti Ukrainy: Prostranstvennyj analiz i vizualizacija metodami GIS-tehnologij [Kurgans of a steppe zone of Ukraine: the spatial analysis and visualization using GIS-based methods]. Virtual'naja arheologija (nerazrushajushhie metody issledovanij, modelirovanie, rekonstrukcii) – Virtual archaeology (nondestructive methods of prospections, modeling, reconstructions): Proceedings of the First International Conference held at the State Hermitage Museum. (pp. 76–85). Izd-vo Gos. Jermitazha [in Russian].

Kruts, V. (1993). Pytannia demohrafii trypilskoi kultury [Demographic issues of Tripoli culture]. Arheologia – Archeology, 3, 30–36 [in Ukrainian].

Larina, O. (2003). Pozdnetripol'skoe pogrebenie gordineshtskogo tipa na Dnestre [Late Tripoli burial of the Gordinest type on the Dniester]. Interferenţe cultural-cronologice în spaţiul nord-pontic. E. Sava (Ed.) (pp. 57–80) [in Russian].

Melnyk, O., & Steblina, I. (2012). Kurhany Kryvorizhzhia [Burial mounds in the Kryvyi Rih region]. Vydavnychyi dim [in Ukrainian].

Pustovalov, S. (1997). Rekonstruktsiia chyselnosti katakombnoho naselennia Stepovoi Ukrainy za materialamy kurhannykh pam’iatok [Reconstruction of the number of the catacomb population of Steppe Ukraine based on the materials of burial mounds]. Arheologia – Archeology, 3, 40–49 [in Ukrainian].

Pustovalov, S. (1999). Do rekonstruktsii dynamiky chyselnosti stepovoho naselennia Ukrainy za materialamy kurhannykh mohylnykiv (eneolit—pizni kochivnyky) [Tо the reconstruction of dynamics the number of the Ukraines steppe-population on burial mounds materials (eneolit – late nomads)]. Naukovi Zapysky. Teoriia Ta Istoriia Kultury – Proceedings. Theory and History of Culture, 13, 17–32 [in Ukrainian].

Chernyh, L. A., & Daragan, M. N. (2014). Kurgany jepohi jeneolita-bronzy mezhdurech'ja Bazavluka, Solenoj, Chertomlyka [Mounds of the Eneolithic-Bronze era between the Bazavluk, Solenoi, and Chertomlyka rivers]. Izdatel' Oleg Filjuk [in Ukrainian].

Ivanov, M., & Tupciyenko, M. (2022). Cultural Interactions Between the Societies of the ‘Old Europe’ and the Steppe ‘Kurgan People’ During the Last Quarter of the 4th Millennium BC: Case Study of Serezlievka Local Group. Archaeologia Lituana, 23, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.15388/ArchLit.2022.23.6 [in English].

Ohlrau, R. (2020). Maidanets’ke. Development and decline of a Trypillia mega-site in Central Ukraine. Sidestone Press [in English].

Videiko, M. Y. (1995). Cemeteries of the Sofievka Type. Field Research, State of Publication of Sources and General Position in the Systematics of Tripolye Culture. Baltic-Pontic Studies, 3, 3–14 [in English].

Published

2023-05-31

bottom of page